Creation vs. Evolution, What was before what we know?

A lover of paleontology, almost two decades ago I began to find many flaws in the theory of evolution. The things I studied and discovered did not correspond to the statements of evolutionists, and there were more and more inconsistencies, inconsistencies, and even outright lies that I came across. What was this due to? Why would there be an interest in manipulating the paleontological record? Who gains anything from that?Paleontology is the science that studies fossil records, that is, prehistoric life.
And although that was my start in researching this book, I also found a web of deceptions in archaeology. What sense would it make to also lie to us with the evidence of the historical processes of the people of the past?My mind lit up when I learned that Freemasonry and the Rockefeller institutions were behind this. At that time I knew little about Freemasonry and about these types of oligarchic families.
I discovered that Freemasonry had been fighting for about 250 years to remove power from the Catholic Church, and intended to rewrite the history of the origin of man. It was precisely Erasmus Darwin - Charles Darwin's uncle - who, as a heavyweight of the Canongate Kilwinning lodge in Edinburgh (founded in 1677), pushed for the funding of evolutionism. Now, on the other hand, the known Western version of the religion holds that the world came into being in 6 days and man and woman emerged from the clay, that a god created them.
Ironically, this version of events did not match the records either, since it seemed more like a representative metaphor than a literal fact. I then came across two inconsistencies, and the only thing that seemed real was the theory of Directed Panspermia, widely defended by the royal astronomer Sir Fred Hoyle, but first proposed by the Nobel Prize winner in Chemistry Svante Arrhenius. Creation vs.
Evolution exposes the great fallacy of the theory of evolution from the prism of mathematics, paleontology, the laws of physics, the principle of determinism, genetics, chemistry, biology and archaeology. He cites great eminences of science and Charles Darwin's own quotes that refute the sporadic process in which a creature would become a superior creature due to chance or environmental influences.
It proves that the supporters of Darwinism and evolution have manipulated the strata, bones and records to hide the truth and lie about the origin of man.